Jones v. Doe et al
| Malik Jones |
| Jane Doe, John Doe and Jacqueline Lashbrook |
| 1:2018cv07887 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the Southern District of Illinoisas case 3:18-cv-02173, filed 12/14/2018. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 5 TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Division the electronic record. (ph, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court transfers this action the complaint and all motions forthwith to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, East St. Louis Division for whatever action the transferee court deems appropriate. The Clerk shall not issue summonses unless the transferee court so directs. This case and all pending motions are terminated on this Court's docket. See order for details. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on December 13, 2018. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or cost by Plaintiff Malik Jones (Attachment). (yap, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (yap, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Malik Jones. (yap, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
