Dixon v. Rick et al
Plaintiff: David F. Dixon
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Clerk of the Cook County Circuit Court, Arron Zivic, Child Support, Falen Rick and Illinois State Treasurer
Case Number: 1:2018cv07897
Filed: November 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Rebecca R Pallmeyer
Referring Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2019 Filing 23 CIRCUIT Rule 3(b) Fee Notice (tt, )
January 18, 2019 Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal regarding notice of appeal #19 ; USCA Case No. 19-1138. (tt, )
January 18, 2019 Filing 21 TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal #19 . Notified counsel (ph, )
January 18, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appeal Due letter sent to counsel of record regarding notice of appeal #19 . (ph, )
January 18, 2019 Filing 18 TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal #16 . Notified counsel (ph, )
January 17, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of appeal by David F. Dixon regarding orders #10 , #13 , #14 . (ph, )
January 15, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appeal Due letter sent to counsel of record regarding notice of appeal #16 . (yap, )
January 14, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of appeal by David F. Dixon regarding orders #10 , #13 . (yap, ) Modified text by Clerk's office on 1/15/2019 (yap, ).
January 10, 2019 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: This court has no jurisdiction to review or interfere with state court orders. For this reason, Mr. Dixon's case has been dismissed. His motion for a restraining order #11 is stricken without prejudice to presentation in state court. Mailed notice. (etv, )
January 10, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Correction regarding #9 . (jh, )
January 9, 2019 Filing 15 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff David F. Dixon. (yap, )
January 9, 2019 Filing 11 PURSUANT TO Rule 15(d) Supplemental pleadings for motion by Plaintiff David F. Dixon to request restraining order (Attachment). (yap, )
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The complaint is dismissed #1 , and Mr. Dixon's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for recruited counsel #4 , #7 are stricken. Because the court can conceive of no claim that would arise under this court's jurisdiction, the dismissal is with prejudice. This order is final and appealable. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 12/11/2018. Mailed notice (jh, )
December 11, 2018 Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT. (jh, )
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The complaint is dismissed #1 , and Mr. Dixon's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for recruited counsel #4 , #7 are stricken. Because the court can conceive of no claim that would arise under this court's jurisdiction, the dismissal is with prejudice. This order is final and appealable. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 12/11/2018. Mailed notice(jh, ) (DOCUMENT ENTERED IN ERROR) Modified on 1/10/2019 (jh, ).
December 3, 2018 Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer for all further proceedings. Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/3/2018. (yap, )
November 30, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lf, )
November 30, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 7 APPLICATION by Plaintiff David F. Dixon for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (lf, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff David F. Dixon for attorney representation (lf, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff David F. Dixon (lf, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Exhibits) (lf, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and six copies by David F. Dixon (Exhibits) (lf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Rick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clerk of the Cook County Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arron Zivic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Child Support
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Falen Rick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Illinois State Treasurer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David F. Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?