JTG Equities, LLC et al v. Greenberg et al
JTG Equities, LLC and Joshua Goldstein |
JG Urban R2, LLC and Joel W Greenberg |
1:2018cv07927 |
November 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion hearing held on 1/23/2019. Plaintiffs' response to defendants' motion to dismiss #12 is due by 2/6/2019. Defendants' reply is due by 2/13/2019. Ruling on motion hearing is set for 2/28/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (cc, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Joel W Greenberg, JG Urban R2, LLC to dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum, #2 Certificate of Service NOM)(Isaacson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Defendants' agreed motion for an extension of time to 1/16/2019 to answer or otherwise plead is granted #9 . No appearance is required on 1/9/2019.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Jeffrey Isaacson for presentment of before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/9/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Isaacson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 First MOTION to Defer Responsive Pleading Deadline (MIDP) , filed by Defendant Joel W Greenberg. (Isaacson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Joel W Greenberg, JG Urban R2, LLC by Jeffrey Isaacson (Isaacson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JTG Equities, LLC, Joshua Goldstein as to JG Urban R2, LLC on 12/15/2018, answer due 1/7/2019. (Tyrrell, Matthew) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JTG Equities, LLC, Joshua Goldstein as to Joel W Greenberg on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Tyrrell, Matthew) |
ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant JG Urban R2, LLC. (jjr, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (rp, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Joel W Greenberg, JG Urban R2, LLC (jjr, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Joshua Goldstein, JTG Equities, LLC by Norman T. Finkel (Finkel, Norman) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Joshua Goldstein, JTG Equities, LLC by Matthew Patrick Tyrrell (Tyrrell, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Tyrrell, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by JTG Equities, LLC, Joshua Goldstein; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15234307. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Tyrrell, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.