Boyd v. IDES et al
| SOMONICA L. BOYD |
| U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, JAYNE DUEWERTH, POUNCY WILLIAMS, MILLICENT HAWKINS, NATAYA JOHNSON, DOUG ST. JOHN, LAURA ROHLFS, IDES, KATHRYN BROWN, , LINDA HOLMES-DODSON, DELORA HAWKINS and Linda Holmes-Dodson |
| 1:2018cv07976 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MAIL RETURNED, for document #11 sent to Somonica L. Boyd returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received; this is the second time the letter has been returned notices will not be shut off because Plaintiff receives notices electronically. (pk, ) |
| Filing 15 RETURN of Minute entry #6 as to Plaintiff Somonica L. Boyd. (smm, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis #13 . She need not pay a filing fee, so it is not clear why the motion was filed. To the extent that she needs the motion to be granted in order to make an appointment with the Pro Se Help Desk, the motion is granted. Emailed notice (eec) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Somonica L. Boyd for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm, ) |
| Filing 12 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Somonica L. Boyd. (smm, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Motion hearing held. Plaintiff appeared in Court. Defendants' motion to dismiss #8 is entered and continued. Plaintiff's response shall be filed by 01/18/2019; Defendants' reply to be filed by 02/04/2019. Plaintiff advised the Court she wished to receive electronic notices. Plaintiff instructed to fill out and file the Pro Se Appearance Form opting to receive electronic notice. The Court advised Plaintiff of the Hibbler Memorial Pro Se assistance program located on the 20th floor. Status hearing set for 02/14/2019 at 10:30 a.m. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the Court's own initiative, the hearing time on the motion to dismiss #8 is reset to 9:00 a.m. on the same date, 12/18/2019. The Court's staff will call Plaintiff at the phone number of record to inform her of the new time. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Ernest Yi Ling for presentment of motion to dismiss #8 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 12/18/2018 at 08:30 AM. (Ling, Ernest) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendants Millicent Hawkins, Doug St. John, U.S. Postal Service, Delora Hawkins, Laura Rohlfs, Jayne Duewerth, Linda Holmes-Dodson, Pouncy Williams, Kathryn Brown, Nataya Johnson to dismiss (Ling, Ernest) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 12/21/2018 at 9:45 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed and mailed notice (slb, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2018: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ). |
| Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to all counsel of record. (smm) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendants, LINDA HOLMES-DODSON, DELORA HAWKINS, DOUG ST. JOHN, JAYNE DUEWERTH, KATHRYN BROWN, LAURA ROHLFS, MILLICENT HAWKINS, NATAYA JOHNSON, POUNCY WILLIAMS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (Ling, Ernest) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by, LINDA HOLMES-DODSON, DELORA HAWKINS, DOUG ST. JOHN, JAYNE DUEWERTH, KATHRYN BROWN, LAURA ROHLFS, MILLICENT HAWKINS, NATAYA JOHNSON, POUNCY WILLIAMS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE re notice of removal, #2 of Filing Notice of Removal (Ling, Ernest) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2018 CH 13572) filed by, LINDA HOLMES-DODSON, DELORA HAWKINS, DOUG ST. JOHN, JAYNE DUEWERTH, KATHRYN BROWN, LAURA ROHLFS, MILLICENT HAWKINS, NATAYA JOHNSON, POUNCY WILLIAMS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Ex. A: State Court Documents; Ex. B: Decision and Judgment in No. 18 C 5438 ; Ex. C: Decision in No. 18 C 5440 (Ling, Ernest) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ling, Ernest) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (yt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
