Shah v. Hartman

Petitioner: Vivek Shah
Respondent: Richard Hartman
Case Number: 1:2018cv07990
Filed: December 4, 2018
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Presiding Judge: Gary Feinerman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
December 4, 2018 4 BRIEF by Vivek Shah in support of petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Exhibit) (bg, )
December 4, 2018 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Vivek Shah for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (bg, )
December 4, 2018 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, )
December 4, 2018 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus and no copies filed by Vivek Shah Hartman (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Envelope not postmarked) (bg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shah v. Hartman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vivek Shah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Hartman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?