Rose E. Garcia v. Karen Stephensen
Plaintiff: ROSE E. GARCIA and Rose E Garcia
Defendant: KAREN STEPHENSEN
Case Number: 1:2018cv08044
Filed: December 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sharon Johnson Coleman
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 12/21/2018. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
December 20, 2018 Filing 15 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. (ym, )
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/20/2018. Mailed notice. (ym, )
December 20, 2018 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 12/20/2018. Plaintiff did not appear. Defendant's motion to vacate state order #11 is granted. Defendant's motion to dismiss #9 is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ym, )
December 17, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Ernest Yi Ling for presentment of motion to vacate #11 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/20/2018 at 08:45 AM. (Ling, Ernest)
December 17, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Karen Stephensen to vacate State Court Order Entered After Removal of Case to Federal Court (Ling, Ernest)
December 14, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Ernest Yi Ling for presentment of motion to dismiss #9 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/20/2018 at 08:45 AM. (Ling, Ernest)
December 14, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Karen Stephensen to dismiss (Ling, Ernest)
December 11, 2018 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are reminded that responsive pleadings must comply with section A(3) of this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. Status hearing set for 2/11/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. In the event that the defendant files a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the defendant is granted leave to notice that motion for presentment at the date and time of the status hearing. Mailed notice. (ym, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 7 STATEMENT by Rose E Garcia. (ph, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 6 MAILED copy of notice of removal letter to plaintiff Rose E Garcia (las, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, )
December 7, 2018 Filing 4 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendant KAREN STEPHENSEN (Ling, Ernest)
December 7, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE by KAREN STEPHENSEN of Filing Notice of Removal (Ling, Ernest)
December 7, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of County, Illinois, case number (18 OP 78727) filed by KAREN STEPHENSEN Ex. A: State court documents (Ling, Ernest)
December 7, 2018 Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ling, Ernest)
December 7, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rose E. Garcia v. Karen Stephensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROSE E. GARCIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rose E Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KAREN STEPHENSEN
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?