Gamble v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al.
| Margaret Gamble |
| TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., Eli Lilly and Company, ELI LILLY INDUSTRIES INC.,, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Eli Lilly Industries Inc. |
| 1:2018cv08107 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Attorney Daniel C. Burke's motion for leave to appear Pro Hac Vice #3 is granted. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Margaret GambleMotion for Pro Hac Vice (0752-15262311) (Burke, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 2 PAYMENT by Margaret Gamble of Pro Hac Fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15262311. (Burke, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Margaret Gamble; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15262074. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burke, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
