CIT Bank N.A. v. Fort et al
| CIT Bank N.A. |
| United States of America c/o HUD and Judith Fort |
| 1:2018cv08156 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Harry D Leinenweber |
| Manish S Shah |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Status hearing held and continued to 2/26/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice(maf) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Motion for extension of time to answer #4 is granted. The Court will set the time to answer at the 2/6/19 status hearing. Mailed notice(maf) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Status hearing set for 2/6/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice(maf) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIT Bank N.A. by Katharine Flynn Lessaris (Lessaris, Katharine) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CIT Bank N.A. by Jena M. Valdetero (Valdetero, Jena) |
| Filing 8 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber for all further proceedings. Honorable Manish S. Shah no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/14/18. (smm, ) |
| MIDP NOTICE: This case has been reassigned to a judge that is not participating in the MIDP Program therefore, this case is no longer part of MIDP Program regarding #8 . (smm, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to Attorney(s) of record. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Motion by Michael Joseph Kelly for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #4 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 1/15/2019 at 09:15 AM. (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Defendant United States of America c/o HUD for extension of time to file answer regarding notice of removal #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Michael Joseph Kelly as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States of America c/o HUD (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kelly, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook, case number (17 CH 16132) filed by United States of America c/o HUD (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Notice of Filing)(Kelly, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
