Mahammad v. Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: FAZLUR MAHAMMAD
Defendant: Prosoft Technology Group, Inc., Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc. and Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv08173
Filed: December 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2019 Filing 39 ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice(gel, )
May 8, 2019 Filing 38 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation #37 , this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. All set dates, including the 5/9/19 status hearing, are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel, )
May 1, 2019 Filing 37 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint with Prejudice) (Burkavage, Andrew)
March 21, 2019 Filing 36 NOTICE by Fazlur Mahammad re amended complaint #35 (Plaintiff's First) (Burkavage, Andrew)
March 21, 2019 Filing 35 Plaintiff's First AMENDED complaint by Fazlur Mahammad against Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. (Burkavage, Andrew)
March 7, 2019 Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 3/7/2019. Oral motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted and any amended complaint shall be filed on or before 3/21/2019.Defendant's motion to dismiss #30 is denied without prejudice. Oral agreed motion to stay answer deadline, pending further order of the Court, is granted. Status hearing set for 5/9/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203 to set additional case management dates. Mailed notice (gel, )
February 20, 2019 Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' motions to dismiss #27 and #30 which are noticed for presentment on 3/7/19. Plaintiff is advised to review the Courts standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Courts homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether he will amend his complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendants' motion to dismiss at the motion hearing on 3/7/19. Status hearing set for 2/27/2019, is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
February 19, 2019 Filing 32 NOTICE by Fazlur Mahammad re status report #31 (Initial Joint) (Burkavage, Andrew)
February 19, 2019 Filing 31 STATUS Report (Initial Joint) by Fazlur Mahammad (Burkavage, Andrew)
February 19, 2019 Filing 30 MOTION by Defendants Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) (Jackson, Brian)
February 19, 2019 Filing 29 NOTICE of Motion by Brian Keith Jackson for presentment of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #27 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 3/7/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Jackson, Brian)
February 19, 2019 Filing 28 MEMORANDUM by Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction #27 (Jackson, Brian)
February 19, 2019 Filing 27 MOTION by Defendants Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Pursuant to Rle 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) (Jackson, Brian)(Incorrect document linked) Text Modified on 2/20/2019 (las, ).
January 17, 2019 Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #24 is granted, and Defendants' responsive pleading is now due 2/19/19. The 1/24/19 Notice of Motion date is stricken, and the parties need not appear. Additionally, the initial status conference previously set for 1/30/19 is stricken and reset for 2/27/19 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. The parties shall file a joint initial status report by 2/19/19. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 15, 2019 Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by Brian Keith Jackson for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #24 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/24/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Jackson, Brian)
January 15, 2019 Filing 24 MOTION by Defendants Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or Otherwise Plead (UNOPPOSED MOTION) (Jackson, Brian)
January 15, 2019 Filing 23 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. by Brian Keith Jackson (Jackson, Brian)
January 15, 2019 Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. by Thomas Stephen Bradley (Bradley, Thomas)
January 14, 2019 Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: William Fuller's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #16 is granted. Michael Guy Holton's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #20 is granted. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 14, 2019 Filing 20 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15368999. (holton, michael)
January 14, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE by Fazlur Mahammad re status report #18 (Initial) (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 14, 2019 Filing 18 STATUS Report (Initial) by Fazlur Mahammad (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 11, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE of Correction regarding MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #16 (las, )
January 10, 2019 Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Fazlur Mahammad to amend/correct Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Fuller, William) Modified on 1/11/2019 (las, ).
January 10, 2019 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: On the Court's own motion, the initial status conference previously set for 1/24/19 is stricken and reset for 1/30/19 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. The 1/14/19 initial status report deadline stands. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 9, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE by Fazlur Mahammad re affidavit of service #13 (Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.) (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 9, 2019 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Fazlur Mahammad regarding Complaint and Summons (Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.) served on Charlie Canessa on 1/8/2019 (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 7, 2019 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: William Fuller's application to appear pro hac vice #7 appears to be blank and is therefore stricken. Attorney Fuller may wish to refile the application. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 4, 2019 ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendant Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.. (jjr, )
January 3, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE by Fazlur Mahammad re affidavit of service #10 (Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.) (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 3, 2019 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Fazlur Mahammad regarding Complaint and Summons (Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.) served on Unable to Serve - Moved on 12/27/2018 (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 3, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE by Fazlur Mahammad re affidavit of service #8 (Prosoft Technology Group, Inc.) (Burkavage, Andrew)
January 3, 2019 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Fazlur Mahammad regarding Complaint and Summons (Prosoft Technology Group, Inc.) served on Roberta Mazesh on 12/27/2018 (Burkavage, Andrew)
December 21, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15310779. (Fuller, William)
December 14, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP%20Standing%20Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 1/24/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 1/14/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, )
December 14, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, )
December 14, 2018 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc., Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. (jjr, )
December 13, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Burkavage, Andrew)
December 13, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff FAZLUR MAHAMMAD by Andrew Joseph Burkavage (Burkavage, Andrew)
December 13, 2018 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff FAZLUR MAHAMMAD by Patrick A. Salvi (Salvi, Patrick)
December 13, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, )
December 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by FAZLUR MAHAMMAD; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15272735.(Salvi, Patrick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mahammad v. Prosoft Technology Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prosoft Technology Group, Inc.
Represented By: Brian Keith Jackson
Represented By: Thomas Stephen Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intellipeople, Inc. d/b/a Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Brian Keith Jackson
Represented By: Thomas Stephen Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kellton Tech Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Stephen Bradley
Represented By: Brian Keith Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FAZLUR MAHAMMAD
Represented By: Patrick A. Salvi
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Burkavage
Represented By: Michael Guy Holton
Represented By: William H Fuller, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?