Smith v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Ryan Smith
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2018cv08174
Filed: December 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey T Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2019 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 is granted. No service necessary under Local Rule 4(b). A briefing schedule will be set after the Administrative Record is filed. Mailed notice (ber, )
February 7, 2019 Filing 11 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert for all further proceedings. Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman no longer assigned to the case Signed by Executive Committee on 2/7/2019. (yap, )
February 7, 2019 Filing 10 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Kelly, Kathryn)
February 7, 2019 Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Kathryn Ann Kelly as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (Kelly, Kathryn)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 GENERAL ORDER 19-0004: RESETTING OF DEADLINES IN CIVIL MATTERS INVOLVING THE UNITED STATES AS A PARTY. IT APPEARING THAT as a result of the partial federal government shutdown, this Court amended General Order 18-0028 suspending as of December 21, 2018, all civil litigation in which the United States of America, its agencies, its officers, or employees were parties, with the stated intention of clarifying schedules in such cases upon the expiration of the lapse in appropriations; and IT FURTHER APPEARING THAT appropriations having been restored to fund the Department of Justice and other Executive Branch agencies, with employees beginning to report for work beginning on January 28, 2019; accordingly IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay entered by General Order 18-0028 is hereby lifted, and any and all deadlines in the affected civil litigation (whether established by order, rule, or agreement.), including but not limited to any scheduled discovery and pleading dates, are extended by 42 days. (For Further Details See Attached Order). Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 1/28/2019: Mailed notice. (mgw, )
January 8, 2019 Filing 7 AMENDED GENERAL ORDER 18-0028 dated 01/08/2019: On December 26, 2018, General Order 18-0028 was entered. It appearing that the lapse of congressional appropriations funding the federal government continues, therefore General Order 18-0028 is now amended. (For Further Details See Attached Order). Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 1/8/2019: Mailed notice. (sm, )
December 27, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The parties should promptly consult with each other on the following topics: 1) Agree to file consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge ;2) Do the parties agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner?, 3) If not, motions for summary judgment shall be briefed as follows: motion for summary judgment shall be filed within 60 days of the filing of the answer and administrative record. Response is due 45 days thereafter. Reply, if any, is due 14 days thereafter. Mailed notice. (ym, )
December 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 GENERAL ORDER 18-0028 dated 12/26/18: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, effective December 26, 2018, that all civil litigation involving as a party the United States of America, is immediately suspended, postponed and held in abeyance continuing for a period of fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this General Order (For Further Details See Attached Order). Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 12/26/2018: Mailed notice. (rp, )
December 13, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, )
December 12, 2018 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ryan Smith for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Schultz, Barry)
December 12, 2018 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ryan Smith by Barry Alan Schultz (Schultz, Barry)
December 12, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schultz, Barry)
December 12, 2018 Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Ryan Smith; (Attachments: #1 AC Decision)(Schultz, Barry) Modified on 12/13/2018 (tt, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Kathryn Ann Kelly
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Smith
Represented By: Barry Alan Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?