Schuppe v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
Michael E. Schuppe |
Harris & Harris, Ltd. |
1:2018cv08221 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Ronald A Guzman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STATUS Report by Michael E. Schuppe (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint until 2/12/2019 #8 is granted. Motion hearing noticed for 1/24/2019 is stricken and no appearance is necessary. Mailed notice (is, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Louis J. Manetti, Jr for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 1/24/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Manetti, Louis) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Harris & Harris, Ltd. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint (Manetti, Louis) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Harris & Harris, Ltd. by Louis J. Manetti, Jr (Manetti, Louis) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Harris & Harris, Ltd. by David M Schultz (Schultz, David) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael E. Schuppe as to Harris & Harris, Ltd. on 12/31/2018, answer due 1/22/2019. (Davidson, Joseph) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Harris & Harris, Ltd. (acm) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The Court orders the parties to appear for an initial status hearing. All parties shall refer to and comply with Judge Guzman's requirements for the initial appearance as outlined in Judge Guzman's case management procedures, which can be found at: www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Initial status hearing set for 2/14/2019 at 09:30 AM. Mailed notice (is, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael E. Schuppe by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael E. Schuppe by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael E. Schuppe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15280619. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schuppe v. Harris & Harris, Ltd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Harris & Harris, Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Louis J. Manetti, Jr. |
Represented By: | David M Schultz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael E. Schuppe | |
Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.