Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.9.205.150
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.9.205.150 |
1:2018cv08516 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sharon Johnson Coleman |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re status report #14 NOTICE OF FILING (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 14 STATUS Report STATUS REPORT by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third party subpoena #9 is granted. No appearance necessary on 1/15/2019. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re memorandum in support of motion, #11 NOTICE OF FILING (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC in support of motion for leave to file #9 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Smith, Marc) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION NOTICE of Motion by Marc Craig Smith for presentment of motion for leave to file #9 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 1/15/2019 at 08:45 AM. (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC for leave to file MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendant of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are reminded that responsive pleadings must comply with section A(3) of this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. Status hearing set for 3/1/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. In the event that the defendant files a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the defendant is granted leave to notice that motion for presentment at the date and time of the status hearing. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 7 MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (sxb, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re notification of affiliates pursuant to local rule 3.2 #4 NOTICE OF FILING (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re complaint #1 , civil cover sheet #2 , attorney appearance #3 NOTIFICATION OF AFFILIATES FRCP 7.1 AND LR 3.2 DISCLOSURE (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC by Marc Craig Smith ATTORNEY APPEARANCE (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Marc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT-ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS INFRINGEMENT filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15319839. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Marc) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.9.205.150 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Marc Craig Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.9.205.150 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.