Anand v. Heath et al
| Narantuya Anand |
| Lexington Law Firm, Fluent, Inc., Porgrexion Marketing, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC, ., John C Heath, Progrexion Marketing, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC and John C Heath Attorney at Law PLLC doing business as Lexington Law Firm |
| 1:2019cv00016 |
| January 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 47 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:: Upon receipt of the parties' joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice #46 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all scheduled hearings and deadlines are stricken and any pending motions are denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 46 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 45 Notice of Settlement by Narantuya Anand with Defendants Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone USA, LLC (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 44 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Defendants' motion for reconsideration #41 is taken under advisement. A response to the motion by the plaintiff is due by 9/12/19; defendants' reply is due by 9/19/19. The status hearing set for 9/25/19 is stricken. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE of Motion by John David Fitzpatrick for presentment of motion for reconsideration #41 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 8/15/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 42 MEMORANDUM by Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC in support of motion for reconsideration #41 (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 41 MOTION by Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC for reconsideration regarding memorandum opinion and order #35 (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 40 ANSWER to Complaint Answer to Fluent Defendants Affirmative Defenses (Document # 36) by Narantuya Anand(Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendants John C Heath, Progrexion Marketing, Inc.. (DiRago, Mary) |
| Filing 38 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC. (ASnen, Neil) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiff Narantuya Anand. (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 36 ANSWER to Complaint by Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC(Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 35 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 6/28/2019. Mailed notice(air, ) |
| Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Status hearing held and continued to 9/25/19 at 9:00 a.m. Defendants Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone's motion to compel arbitration #21 is denied. The Court will issue an opinion shortly. Once the parties have made their complete MIDP exchanges, which are due by 7/19/19, they may move forward with discovery thereafter. Defendants' answers are due by 7/11/19. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:he status hearing currently set for 5/14 is re-scheduled to 6/20 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 32 REPLY by Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC to motion to compel #21 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Bhadania Decl.)(Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 31 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Narantuya Anand to motion to compel #21 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 30 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Narantuya Anand to answer to complaint #24 Answers to Lexington Law's Affirmative and Other Defenses (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Narantuya Anand to answer to complaint #25 Answers to Progrexion Marketing's Affirmative and Other Defenses (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Motion hearing held. Defendants Fluent, Inc. and Reward Zone's motion to compel arbitration #21 is taken under advisement. Plaintiff's response to the motion is due by 4/9/19; defendants' reply is due by 4/23/19. If defendants Heath and Progrexion join the motion to compel #21 , they are to do so by 3/19/19. The same briefing schedule will apply. Any MIDP obligations are held in abeyance until further order. A status hearing is set on 5/14/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 27 STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Narantuya Anand (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Presentment on defendants' motion to compel arbitration is reset from 3/5 to 3/12/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Complaint by Progrexion Marketing, Inc. (DiRago, Mary) |
| Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint by John C Heath(DiRago, Mary) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Motion by John David Fitzpatrick for presentment of motion to compel #21 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 3/5/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM by Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC in support of motion to compel #21 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mitenkumar Bhadania, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration)(Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 21 MOTION by Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC to compel Arbitration (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Neil Ansen's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #19 is granted. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15430259. (ASnen, Neil) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The agreed motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint to 2/25/19 #15 is granted. No appearance on the motion is required. The initial status conference currently scheduled for 2/12 is reset to 3/12/19 at 9:00 a.m. Initial status report due 3/5.Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC by George V. Desh (Desh, George) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by John David Fitzpatrick for presentment of extension of time #15 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 1/30/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC for extension of time to respond to complaint (agreed) (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Fluent, Inc., Reward Zone USA, LLC by John David Fitzpatrick (Fitzpatrick, John) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The agreed motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint #11 is granted. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by 2/25/19. No appearance on the motion is required. The initial status conference scheduled for 2/12/19 is reset to 3/6/19 at 9:00 a.m. The initial status report is due by 2/28/19. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Mary S DiRago for presentment of extension of time #11 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 1/24/2019 at 09:00 AM. (DiRago, Mary) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendants John C Heath, Progrexion Marketing, Inc. for extension of time Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (DiRago, Mary) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants John C Heath, Progrexion Marketing, Inc. by Mary S DiRago (DiRago, Mary) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: This case is set for an initial status conference on 2/12/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status conferences, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?79eF+7uiX7ewBj/ITKrjoA==], and to submit the required initial status report no later than 2/5/19. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Narantuya Anand as to Progrexion Marketing, Inc. on 1/4/2019, answer due 1/25/2019. (Raphael, Lance) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Narantuya Anand as to Fluent, Inc. on 1/4/2019, answer due 1/25/2019. (Raphael, Lance) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Fluent, Inc., Progrexion Marketing, Inc. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Narantuya Anand by Christopher Davis Kruger (Kruger, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Narantuya Anand by Craig Rein Frisch (Frisch, Craig) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Narantuya Anand by Lance A. Raphael (Raphael, Lance) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Raphael, Lance) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Narantuya Anand; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15326057.(Raphael, Lance) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
