Rhine v. HCC, Inc.
| Michael Rhine |
| HCC, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00082 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Michael Rhine. HCC, Inc. waiver sent on 1/4/2019, answer due 3/5/2019. (File, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant HCC, Inc. by Sukrat Ahmed Baber (Baber, Sukrat) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant HCC, Inc. by Kevin Michael O'Hagan (O'Hagan, Kevin) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Joint status report due by 3/11/2019. Status hearing set for 3/14/2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/31/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael Rhine by Bridgette Ann Kolb (Kolb, Bridgette) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to David Michael Van Den Bussche on 1/4/2019 by Plaintiff Michael Rhine. Waiver of service due by 2/4/2019. (File, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael Rhine by Joshua M File (File, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (File, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Rhine; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15333884.(File, Joshua) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rhine v. HCC, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HCC, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sukrat Ahmed Baber |
| Represented By: | Kevin Michael O'Hagan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Rhine | |
| Represented By: | Joshua M File |
| Represented By: | Bridgette Ann Kolb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
