Torres et al v. Judicial Sales Corporation et al
Rosee Torres and Noel Torres |
Judicial Sales Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Edward Peterka, Joel Knosher, MR Capital Group, LLC and Manley Deas & Kochalski, LLC |
1:2019cv00112 |
January 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Andrea R Wood |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: As the Court requires additional time to complete its review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), the status hearing previously set for 2/28/2019 is stricken and reset for 4/2/2019 at 09:00 AM. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
Filing 17 MOTION by Plaintiff Rosee Torres for service of process at governments expense (tg, ) |
Filing 16 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Rosee Torres (tg, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER: Motion hearing held. Only Plaintiff Rosee Torres appeared pro se. Plaintiff's affidavit accompanying motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis #3 is terminated. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #13 is granted, as Plaintiff has demonstrated that she cannot afford the fees and costs associated with filing this action. Pursuant to the discussion held in open court and for the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's emergency motion to stay and injunction resale of property #11 is denied. Plaintiff's complaint is taken under advisement for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The status hearing is continued to 2/28/2019 at 9:30 AM. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 1/29/2019. Mailed notice (td, ) |
Filing 14 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Rosee Torres (las, ) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Rosee Torres for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (lf, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Rosee Torres for presentment of Emergency motion to stay #11 before Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 1/29/2019 at 09:00 AM. (gcy, ) |
Filing 11 EMERGENCY MOTION by Plaintiff Rosee Torres to stay & injunction Re Sale of Property. (Exhibits). (gcy, ) |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Rosee Torres - No.2. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Rosee Torres - No.1. (Exhibits) (Poor Quality, Original Document on File) (jh, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
Filing 5 JURY Demand. (ph, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiffs Noel Torres and Rosee Torres. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiffs Noel Torres and Rosee Torres. (ph, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 7 copies by Noel Torres and Rosee Torres. (Exhibits) (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.