Pet Food Pentobarbituriction v. Pharmaceutical Corporations et al
| Pet Food Pentobarbituriction |
| American Veterinary Medical Association and Pharmaceutical Corporations |
| 1:2019cv00148 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 2/11/2019.Mailed notice.(jlj, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Plaintiff failed to appear. For the reasons stated on the record, this case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Enter judgment order. Civil case closed.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for extension of time #7 is granted. The time for Plaintiff to comply with the 1/10/2019 order #5 is extended to 2/6/2019. The status hearing set for 1/31/2019 #5 is stricken and re-set for 2/11/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM by Pet Food Pentobarbituriction in support of enlargement of time #7 . (kp, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Pet Food Pentobarbituriction for enlargement of time pursuant to F.R.Civ.P Rule 6(B). (kp, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Pet Food Pentobarbituriction. (kp, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: On the court's own motion, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing, by 1/24/2019, why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The complaint #1 premises jurisdiction on the diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), but it does not properly allege the citizenship of any of the parties. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a Jurisdictional Addendum that properly alleges the citizenship of all parties. Failure to comply will result in the summary dismissal of this suit for want of subject matter jurisdiction. Status hearing set for 1/31/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (kp, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pet Food Pentobarbituriction. (kp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
