Kaplan v. Peabody

Plaintiff: Harvey Charles Kaplan
Defendant: George Shattuck Peabody
Case Number: 1:2019cv00181
Filed: January 9, 2019
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
January 9, 2019 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Harvey Charles Kaplan (bg, )
January 9, 2019 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Harvey Charles Kaplan for attorney representation (bg, )
January 9, 2019 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Harvey Charles Kaplan for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (bg, )
January 9, 2019 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, )
January 9, 2019 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Harvey Charles Kaplan (Exhibit) (bg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaplan v. Peabody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Shattuck Peabody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harvey Charles Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?