Washington v. Wainscott et al
Desmond Washington |
Officer Ben Fapso, City of Mundelein, Officer Brian Wainscott and City of North Chicago |
1:2019cv00256 |
January 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sharon Johnson Coleman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 NOTICE of Motion by Denise Nicole Kruse for presentment of extension of time #20 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 3/15/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Kruse, Denise) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM by City of Mundelein, Officer Brian Wainscott in support of extension of time #20 (Kruse, Denise) |
Filing 20 MOTION by Defendants City of Mundelein, Officer Brian Wainscott for extension of time Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Kruse, Denise) |
Filing 19 STATUS Report Initial Joint Status Report by Desmond Washington (Kroeger, Robert) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Motion by Julie M Koerner for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #17 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 3/15/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Koerner, Julie) |
Filing 17 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant City of North Chicago (Koerner, Julie) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Officer Ben Fapso by Tony Salvatore Fioretti Amended Appearance (Fioretti, Tony) |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Officer Ben Fapso by Michael D. Bersani Amended Appearance (Bersani, Michael) |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Officer Ben Fapso by Tony Salvatore Fioretti (Fioretti, Tony) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Officer Ben Fapso by Michael D. Bersani (Bersani, Michael) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Desmond Washington. Officer Ben Fapso waiver sent on 2/26/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. (Kroeger, Robert) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Mundelein, Officer Brian Wainscott by Denise Nicole Kruse (Kruse, Denise) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Mundelein, Officer Brian Wainscott by Alison M Harrington (Harrington, Alison) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: North Chicago's unopposed motion for extension of time #7 is granted. North Chicago's responsive pleading is due by 3/12/2019. No further extensions will be permitted. No appearance necessary on 2/21/2019. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 8 UNOPPOSED NOTICE of Motion by Julie M Koerner for presentment of extension of time #7 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 2/21/2019 at 08:45 AM. (Koerner, Julie) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant City of North Chicago for extension of time to File a Responsive Pleading (Koerner, Julie) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of North Chicago by Julie M Koerner (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Koerner, Julie) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff is directed to advise the defendants of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are reminded that responsive pleadings must comply with section A(3) of this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. Status hearing set for 3/15/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. In the event that the defendant files a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the defendant is granted leave to notice that motion for presentment at the date and time of the status hearing. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Desmond Washington by Robert Kroeger (Kroeger, Robert) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City of Mundelein, City of North Chicago, Officer Ben Fapso, Officer Brian Wainscott (jjr, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Desmond Washington by Blake Wolfe Horwitz (Horwitz, Blake) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Desmond Washington; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15365903. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kroeger, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.