Sahattchieve v. Wilbur Wrigth College
| Jordan Antonov Sahattchieve |
| Wilbur Wrigth College |
| 1:2019cv00326 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The plaintiff having failed to file a renewed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or an amended complaint by the stated deadline of February 26, 2019 #5 , the plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (air, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff Jordan Sahattchieve's Complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Sahattchieve's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") #3 is also denied without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send Sahattchieve a financial affidavit so that, if he wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he may provide the Court with information necessary to determine his indigent status. Sahattchieve is granted leave to file an amended IFP application and amended complaint by February 26, 2019; absent timely filings addressing the issues discussed below, this case will be terminated. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 1/28/2019. Mailed notice. (sxb, )
|
| MAILED a financial affidavit and a copy of the order dated 1/28/2019 #5 to plaintiff Jordan Antonov Sahattchieve (sxb, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Jordan Antonov Sahattchieve and/or writ to proceed in forma pauperis (sxb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (sxb, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Jordan Antonov Sahattchieve (sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sahattchieve v. Wilbur Wrigth College | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jordan Antonov Sahattchieve | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wilbur Wrigth College | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
