Perez v. Cook County et al
| Honorio Perez |
| Tom Dart, Lagunas and Cook County |
| 1:2019cv00370 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed as duplicative of the complaint submitted in Perez v. Dart, No. 18 C 5249 (N.D. Ill.) (Coleman, J.). This case is administratively closed. Because the Court is administratively closing this case, a filing fee will not be assessed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b) nor will a "strike" be assessed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff is warned, however, that future duplicative lawsuits may be dismissed as frivolous or malicious under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). See Smith v. Gleason, No. 12-cv-633-WMC, 2013 WL 6238488, at *7 (W.D. Wis. Nov. 27, 2013) ("Repetitive allegations are considered malicious and are grounds for dismissal under the PLRA.") (citing Lindell v. McCallum, 352 F.3d 1107, 1109-10 (7th Cir. 2003)). Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 2/11/2019. Mailed notice. (ym, )
|
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Honorio Perez (Exhibit) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Envelope not postmarked) (bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
