Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 73.211.147.120 and John Doe |
| 1:2019cv00378 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant John Doe by Erin Kathryn Russell (Russell, Erin) |
Filing 13
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference #8 is granted. No appearance is required on 2/12/2019. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/5/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
| Filing 12 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (Attachments: #1 Copyright Registration)(kp, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re memorandum in support of motion, #10 NOTICE OF FILING (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC in support of motion for leave to file #8 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Marc Craig Smith for presentment of motion for leave to file #8 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/12/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC for leave to file MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Status hearing set for 4/2/2019 at 09:00 AM. The filing of a joint status report is not required.Mailed notice (srn, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re notification of affiliates pursuant to local rule 3.2 #4 NOTICE OF FILING (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re complaint #1 NOTIFICATION OF AFFILIATES FRCP 7.1 AND LR 3.2 DISCLOSURE (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC by Marc Craig Smith ATTORNEY APPEARANCE (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT-ACTION FOR DAMAGES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS INFRINGEMENT filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15392078. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Marc) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
