Small v. St. James Hospital and Health Centers et al
| Bridget Small |
| United States America, Franciscan Alliances, Inc., Nicholas Gustafson, St. James Hospital and Health Centers, Franciscan Health and Franciscan St. J ames Health |
| 1:2019cv00560 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice #13 is granted. Defendants motion to dismiss #6 is denied as moot. All scheduled hearings and deadlines are stricken and any other pending motions are denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Bridget Small to dismiss without prejudice (Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bridget Small by Kellie Jean Snyder (Snyder, Kellie) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bridget Small by Mark A Brown (Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bridget Small by Mark A Brown (Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Motion hearing held. United States' motion to dismiss #6 is taken under advisement. Plaintiff's response to the motion is due by 3/26/19. No reply is required at this time. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Franciscan Alliances, Inc., Franciscan Health, Franciscan St. J ames Health, Nicholas Gustafson, St. James Hospital and Health Centers by Dina Torrisi Martin (Martin, Dina) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by Gina Elizabeth Brock for presentment of motion to dismiss #6 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 2/26/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Brock, Gina) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant United States America to dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Brock, Gina) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record (bg, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Removal filed by United States America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Brock, Gina) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION of Gina Elizabeth Brock as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States America (Brock, Gina) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brock, Gina) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
