Tacori Enterprises v. KD Creations Jewelry Inc.
Tacori Enterprises |
KD Creations Jewelry Inc. |
1:2019cv00583 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Copyright |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Howard Alan Kroll for presentment of motion for entry of default, #15 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 4/2/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 15 MOTION by Plaintiff Tacori Enterprises for entry of default against Defendant KD Creations Jewelry Inc. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Motion that the Clerk of the Court enter a default against Defendant KD Creations Jewelry Inc.)(Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Plaintiff's motion for entry of default #13 is stricken. Local Rule 5.3(b) clearly specifies that all motions must be accompanied by a notice of motion specifying the date and time on which, and the judge before whom, the motion is to be presented. Plaintiff is instructed to refile its motion with the proper notice, and is further cautioned to comply with the procedures set forth in this Courts standing order with respect to motion practice.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Tacori Enterprises for entry of default against Defendant KD Creations Jewelry Inc. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Motion that the Clerk of the Court Enter a Default Against Defendant KD Creations Jewelry Inc.)(Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 12 REQUEST For Default against Defendant KD Creations Jewelry Inc. (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 11 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Tacori Enterprises (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tacori Enterprises as to KD Creations Jewelry Inc. on 2/8/2019, answer due 3/1/2019. (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 4/2/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 8 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (Attachments: #1 exhibit)(las, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, ) |
Filing 6 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright by Tacori Enterprises (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Tacori Enterprises (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Tacori Enterprises and Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tacori Enterprises by Howard Alan Kroll (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement and Trademark Infringement filed by Tacori Enterprises; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15426564. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Kroll, Howard) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant KD Creations Jewelry Inc. (ec, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tacori Enterprises v. KD Creations Jewelry Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tacori Enterprises | |
Represented By: | Howard Alan Kroll |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: KD Creations Jewelry Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.