Jones v. Berryhill
Houston J Jones, IV |
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill |
1:2019cv00604 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sunil R Harjani |
Charles P Kocoras |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Harjani for all further proceedings. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 4/1/2019. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision is due by 5/31/2019; Defendant's motion to affirm the decision is due by 7/15/2019; Plaintiff's reply brief is due by 7/29/2019. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week prior to the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice (lxs, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Gary Feinerman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 3/11/2019. (sxb, ) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The parties have consented to proceed before Magistrate Judge Harjani 13 . The status hearing set for 4/29/2019 #6 is stricken. The parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Harjani for further proceedings.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Horn, John) |
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Valerie Rebecca Raedy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (Raedy, Valerie) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue summons forthwith and plaintiff's counsel to serve defendant with process. Initial status hearing scheduled for 4/29/2019 at 9:00 a.m. By 4/22/2019, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating whether they agree to a remand and whether they consent to reassignment for all purposes to the Magistrate Judge. With respect to scheduling, the parties shall comply with Local Rule 16.4.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that further judicial action is required in 19 CV 604, Jones v. Berryhill, which is assigned to the Hon. Charles P. Kocoras, who is not receiving civil cases where the United States of America is a party; therefore It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of Court is to reassign by lot 19 CV 604, Jones v. Berryhill, to another district court judge of this Court. Case reassigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman for all further proceedings. Honorable Charles P. Kocoras no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/5/2019. (bg, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Houston J Jones, IV for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Horn, John) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Houston J Jones, IV by John E. Horn (Horn, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Horn, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Houston J Jones, IV; (Horn, John) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.