Gandy v. Carreto
| Rodney D Gandy |
| Chicago Police Department and P.O. Carreto |
| 1:2019cv00751 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED complaint by Rodney D Gandy against P.O. Carreto. (kp, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's amended complaint #6 is accepted. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to: (1) file Plaintiff's amended complaint #6 ; (2) issue summons for service of the amended complaint on Defendant Carreto; (3) dismiss the Chicago Police Department as a Defendant, (4) correct the caption and title of the case to read, Rodney D. Gandy v. P.O. Carreto; and (5) send Plaintiff a copy of this order. The Marshal is appointed to serve Defendant using the USM Form-285 submitted by Plaintiff 7 . Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 4/2/2019. Mailed notice. (kp, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued along with USM 285 form(s), certified copy of order dated #8 4/2/19 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to defendant P.O. Carreto via email. (kp, ) |
| MAILED a copy of this order #8 to Plaintiff. (kp, ) |
| Filing 6 RECEIVED Amended Complaint and no copies by Rodney D Gandy (Envelope not postmarked). (ew, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $18.33 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk to electronically send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Cook County Jail. Summons however shall not issue. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which this Court can grant relief. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must: (1) submit an amended complaint that both states a claim that can proceed and that names suable parties as Defendants and (2) submit a completed USM-285 (Marshals Service) form for each Defendant named in the amended complaint. An amended complaint is due by 4/19/2019. Failure to comply with these instructions will result in dismissal of this case for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff, along with an amended civil rights complaint form and a blank USM-285 service form. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice to later renewal. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 3/4/2019. Mailed notice. (ew, )
|
| EMAILED order dated 3/4/2019 #5 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail. (ew, ) |
| MAILED a copy of the order dated 3/4/2019 #5 to Plaintiff, along with an amended civil rights complaint form and a blank USM-285 service form. (ew, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Rodney D Gandy for attorney representation (bg, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Rodney D Gandy for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibit) (bg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Rodney D Gandy (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Envelope not postmarked) (bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
