Banister v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Delois A. Banister |
| U.S. Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2019cv00793 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED two blank USM-285 forms to plaintiff (las, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 3/18/2019 to the US Marshal's Office as to Defendants J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A. via email. (las, ) |
| Filing 14 COMPLAINT filed by Delois A. Banister; (las, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of financial indigency, Plaintiff's motion #4 to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion #5 for attorney representation is denied for now and without prejudice. Plaintiff lists only one firm that she has contacted about retaining for a fee. She must contact at least three law firms, legal clinics, or legal services organizations to ask about pro bono representation (that is, for no charge). Also, Plaintiff is a college graduate and this case is in the initial stages, so she might be able to competently represent herself; more litigation is required before deciding that issue with confidence. Defendant U.S. Bank's extension motion #10 is terminated as unnecessary: there is no answer deadline yet. The Marshals Service is appointed to serve the Defendants, and the Clerk's Office shall issue summons as to the Defendants. Also, the Clerk's Office shall mail two blank USM-285 forms to Plaintiff, who shall complete and return them to the Marshals Service by 04/08/2019. These forms are required before the Marshals Service will attempt service. The Court notes that, after service of process, the parties must address whether there is subject matter jurisdiction if Plaintiff is challenging a judgment entered in state court. See Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Johnson v. Orr, 551 F.3d 564, 567 (7th Cir. 2008). A status hearing is set for 04/22/2019 at 10:00 AM.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. by Jonathan Daniel Nusgart (Nusgart, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Craig C. Smith for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #10 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 3/20/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Smith, Craig) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. for extension of time to file answer regarding received complaint #1 or otherwise plead (Smith, Craig) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. by Craig C. Smith (Smith, Craig) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Delois A. Banister for attorney representation. (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Delois A. Banister for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Delois A. Banister. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Delois A. Banister. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
