Singleton v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James Singleton
Defendant: Wright Medical Group, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00796
Filed: February 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Kendall
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2019 Filing 21 FIRST AMENDED complaint by James Singleton against Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (McLaughlin, Robert)
February 27, 2019 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial Status hearing held on 2/27/2019. Amended Complaint shall be filed by 3/20/2019. Answer or responsive pleading shall be due by 4/10/2019. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #10 is stricken with leave to reinstate. Plaintiffs Expert Witness Disclosures due by 10/18/2019. Wright Medicals Expert Disclosures due by 12/2/2019. Expert Discovery ordered closed by 1/13/2020. Dispositive Motions with supporting memoranda shall be filed by 2/13/2020. Mailed notice (lk, )
February 25, 2019 Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Attorney Sean Burke's Motion to appear pro hac vice #16 is granted. Mailed notice (lk, )
February 21, 2019 Filing 18 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT FOR CASES NEWLY FILED by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Darke, Richard)
February 20, 2019 Filing 17 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice of Wright Medical Group, Inc. (St. Aubin, Keith)
February 20, 2019 Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15502761. (Burke, Sean)
February 15, 2019 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #10 . Response due by 3/1/2019. Reply due by 3/8/2019. Status Hearing set for 4/25/2019 at 9:00 AM. Initial Status hearing set for 2/27/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Motion hearing set for 2/21/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
February 15, 2019 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 2/27/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 2/21/2019. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, )
February 14, 2019 MOTION by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. to strike Plaintiff's complaint. (Omitted Relief from Motion #10 .) (smm, )
February 14, 2019 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Attorney Anne Gruner's Motion to appear pro hac vice #9 is granted. Mailed notice (lk, )
February 14, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Keith M St. Aubin for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #10 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/21/2019 at 09:00 AM. (St. Aubin, Keith)
February 14, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #10 (St. Aubin, Keith)
February 14, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (St. Aubin, Keith)
February 12, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15475282. (Gruner, Anne)
February 11, 2019 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff James Singleton by Christina Maria Flores (Flores, Christina)
February 11, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff James Singleton by Robert John McLaughlin (McLaughlin, Robert)
February 8, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, )
February 8, 2019 Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to all counsel of record. (smm, )
February 7, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. by Keith M St. Aubin (St. Aubin, Keith)
February 7, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. by Richard Patrick Darke (Darke, Richard)
February 7, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Darke, Richard)
February 7, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2018 L 013522) filed by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15461097. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Darke, Richard)
February 7, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singleton v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Keith M St. Aubin
Represented By: Richard Patrick Darke
Represented By: Sean K Burke
Represented By: Anne A Gruner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Singleton
Represented By: Robert John McLaughlin
Represented By: Christina Maria Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?