International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 and Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund |
McKesson Corporation, MALLINCKRODT, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., JOSEPH GIACCHINO, American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Geriatric Society, American Pain Society, Watson Laboratories Inc., Actavis PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Endo International PLC, Actavis LLC, ALLERGAN PLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon Inc., PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., Actavis Pharma Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Purdue Pharma Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., RHODES PHARMACEUTICALS, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation, PAUL MADISON, Noramco, Inc., MALLINCKRODT, PLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and Purdue Federick Company, Inc. |
1:2019cv00811 |
February 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sharon Johnson Coleman |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 CERTIFIED copy of order dated 3/14/2019 from the 7th Circuit; Appellate case no. : 19-1359; IT IS ORDERED that the petitioners motion for leave to file a reply is granted to the extent that the panel considered the reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. (kp, ) |
Filing 22 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CIRCUIT Rule 3(b) Notice (sxb, ) |
Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal ; USCA Case No. 19-1359. (sxb, ) |
Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 2/21/2019. Defendant McKesson Corporation's motion to stay proceedings pending possible transfer to multidistrict litigation #15 is granted. Plaintiffs presented their motion to remand to the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois #12 , which the Court stays pending resolution of the possible transfer to multidistrict litigation. Defendants McKesson Corporation and AmerisourceBergen Corporation's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint #18 is granted. Defendants McKesson Corporation and AmerisourceBergen Corporation must answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs' complaint within 30 days of the later of either (1) this action's remand to state court or (2) the entry of a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granting a motion to vacate the conditional transfer order covering this action or finally denying transfer of this action to the multidistrict litigation. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by Daniel L. Stanner for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #18 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 2/26/2019 at 08:45 AM. (Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant McKesson Corporation for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs' complaint (Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE by Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fundin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant McKesson Corporation to stay proceedings pending likely transfer to MDL #15 (Richman, Benjamin) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Daniel L. Stanner for presentment of motion to stay, #15 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 2/21/2019 at 08:45 AM. (Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant McKesson Corporation to stay proceedings pending likely transfer to MDL (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Benjamin Harris Richman for presentment of motion to remand, #12 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 2/21/2019 at 08:45 AM. (Richman, Benjamin) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM by Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund in support of motion to remand, #12 (Richman, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund to remand to the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL (Richman, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund by Rafey S. Balabanian (Balabanian, Rafey) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund by Jay Edelson (Edelson, Jay) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund by Benjamin Harris Richman (Richman, Benjamin) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund by Ari Jonathan Scharg (Scharg, Ari) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (ek, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant McKesson Corporation by Kyle Alexander Cooper (Cooper, Kyle) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McKesson Corporation (Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant McKesson Corporation by Daniel L. Stanner (Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Stanner, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019 CH 01548) filed by McKesson Corporation Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15463424. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Stanner, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.