Mufti et al v. Figus Trucking, Inc. et al
| Mohammed Mufti and Osama Mufti |
| Kania Express, Inc. and Figus Trucking, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00938 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service Affidavit of Service of Process on Kania Express by Paul Strauss on behalf of Osama Mufti (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Service Afffidavit of Service of Process on Figus Trucking by Paul Strauss on behalf of Osama Mufti (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Osama Mufti regarding Complaint service on Kania Express served on Daniel Kania on March 8, 2019 (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Osama Mufti regarding Complaint service on Figus Trucking served on Marija Bekjarska on March 8, 2019 (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED complaint by Osama Mufti against All Defendants and terminating Mohammed Mufti (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Correction regarding #7 (ek, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED complaint #1 (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 6 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Osama Mufti and Mohammed Mufti (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 4/24/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Figus Trucking, Inc., Kania Express, Inc. (kb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Mohammed Mufti, Osama Mufti by Paul Strauss (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Strauss, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Osama Mufti; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15486954.(Strauss, Paul) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
