Hernandez et al v. Broida and Nichele, LTD.
Plaintiff: Mario Mendoza and Elizabeth Hernandez
Defendant: Broida and Nichele, LTD.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00943
Filed: February 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Durkin
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:The 4/25/2019 status hearing is vacated.Mailed notice (srn, )
April 2, 2019 Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Defendant's motion to dismiss #12 is denied without prejudice. Motion hearing held on 4/2/2019. Defendant's motion to dismiss the first amended complaint is to be filed by 5/2/2019. Plaintiffs' response is due 5/23/2019. Defendant's reply is due 6/6/2019. Status hearing set for 6/26/2019 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice (srn, )
March 29, 2019 Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza against Broida and Nichele, LTD. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C)(Edelman, Daniel)
March 22, 2019 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza by Mary Frances Charlton (Charlton, Mary)
March 21, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Joseph K. Nichele for presentment of motion to dismiss #12 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/2/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Nichele, Joseph)
March 21, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Broida and Nichele, LTD. to dismiss (Nichele, Joseph)
March 21, 2019 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Broida and Nichele, LTD. by Joseph K. Nichele (Nichele, Joseph)
March 21, 2019 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Broida and Nichele, LTD. by Ronald J. Broida (Broida, Ronald)
March 11, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza as to Broida and Nichele, LTD. on 2/28/2019, answer due 3/21/2019. (Waldera, Paul)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Joint status report due by 4/19/2019. Status hearing set for 4/25/2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/26/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
February 20, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Broida and Nichele, LTD. (pj, )
February 15, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, )
February 14, 2019 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza by Paul Michael Waldera (Waldera, Paul)
February 14, 2019 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara)
February 14, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza by Cathleen M. Combs (Combs, Cathleen)
February 14, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel)
February 14, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Edelman, Daniel)
February 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Elizabeth Hernandez, Mario Mendoza; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15487902. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A-B)(Edelman, Daniel)
February 14, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez et al v. Broida and Nichele, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Mendoza
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Represented By: Paul Michael Waldera
Represented By: Tara Leigh Goodwin
Represented By: Cathleen M. Combs
Represented By: Mary Frances Charlton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Hernandez
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Represented By: Paul Michael Waldera
Represented By: Tara Leigh Goodwin
Represented By: Cathleen M. Combs
Represented By: Mary Frances Charlton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broida and Nichele, LTD.
Represented By: Ronald J. Broida
Represented By: Joseph K. Nichele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?