Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel v. Sholom
| El-Essene Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel |
| Anshe Sholom |
| 1:2019cv01170 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied because it is incomplete. Plaintiff did not disclose the amount of money he received from social security as required by question 4.D. and 4.G. Because plaintiff seeks in forma pauperis status, his complaint is governed by 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), which authorizes district courts to screen complaints and dismiss those that fail to state a claim. See Jaros v. IDOC, 684 F.3d 667, 669 n.1 (7th Cir. 2012). Plaintiff's complaint is difficult to follow, but stripped of its conclusory allegations of racial discrimination, it alleges that he was not allowed entry into a synagogue because of his hair style, but he used to worship there. #1 at 12. Plaintiff names the congregation as the defendant. The allegations are not sufficient to state a plausible claim that the synagogue was a public accommodation that discriminated against plaintiff on account of his race. There are other allegations that plaintiff was arrested and charged with a crime, but the complaint does not name any individual state actors (or allege any policy sufficient to name any municipality as a defendant) and it does not allege that any private actor falsely initiated criminal proceedings that caused plaintiff to be seized without probable cause such that a federal cause of action could lie against the congregation. The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Enter judgment and terminate case. The motion for attorney representation #5 is denied as moot. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ew, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff El-Essene Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel for attorney representation. (ew, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff El-Essene Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ew, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff El-Essene Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel. (ew, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ew, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and seven copies by El-Essene Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel; Exhibit. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel v. Sholom | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: El-Essene Y'Isroyal-Y'Israel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Anshe Sholom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
