Norwood v. Cajic et al
Octwaviss Norwood |
c/o Ceerly, c/o Cajic and Aton Cross |
1:2019cv01224 |
February 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Charles R Norgle |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILED a copy of order dated 4/4/19 and a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to Plaintiff. (lf, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to either (1) submit a renewed application, in accordance with this order, or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. Failure to comply with this order by 5-6, 2019 will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed informa pauperis and a copy of this order. The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff's complaint #1 and related pleadings #4 until after his fee status is resolved. Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 4/4/2019. Mailed notice (lf, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Octwaviss Norwood for attorney representation. (ew, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Octwaviss Norwood for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; Exhibit. (ew, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ew, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Octwaviss Norwood. (Attachments: #1 Envelope not postmarked)(ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.