Carrell v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
| Dale Carrell |
| Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. |
| 1:2019cv01245 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial Status hearing held on 4/8/2019. Parties' oral motion for extension of time to respond/reply to Motion to Dismiss #15 is granted. Response due by 4/26/2019. Reply due by 5/3/2019. Status Hearing reset for 7/9/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #15 . Response due by 4/19/2019. Reply due by 4/26/2019. Status Hearing set for 6/19/2019 at 9:00 AM. Initial Status hearing set for 4/8/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Erin Vaughn for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #15 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/8/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #15 (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's Motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #11 is granted. Answer shall be filed by 4/1/2019. Initial Status hearing reset for 4/8/2019 at 9:00 AM. Status and Motion hearings set for 3/14/2019 are stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 13 STATUS Report Initial Status Report for Cases Newly Filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Erin Vaughn for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #11 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/14/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp. for extension of time to file answer Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corporation's Uncontested Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Complaint (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 3/14/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 3/11/2019. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dale Carrell by Jennifer Cascio (Cascio, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dale Carrell by Christina Maria Flores (Flores, Christina) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dale Carrell by Robert John McLaughlin (McLaughlin, Robert) |
| Filing 6 EMAILED notice of removal letter to counsel of record. (ph, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Howmedica Osteonics Corporation (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corporation by Erin Vaughn (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vaughn, Erin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2019 L 000601) filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corporation Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15500020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Vaughn, Erin) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
