Navigant Consulting Inc v. Zuchowski et al
Navigant Consulting Inc |
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Office of General Counsel, Attorney General, Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Center Director Laura B Zuchowski, Civil Process Clerk, L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen and Laura B Zuchowski |
1:2019cv01258 |
February 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Laura B Zuchowski by John Joseph William Inkeles (Inkeles, John) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 5/3/19 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Navigant Consulting Inc as to All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney)(Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Navigant Consulting Inc as to Laura B Zuchowski served on 2/25/2019, answer due 4/26/2019 (Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants L. Francis Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Laura B Zuchowski (Oswald, Craig) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (kp, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Navigant Consulting Inc by Gretchen Heinzmann Ekerdt (Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Navigant Consulting Inc; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15503724. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Ekerdt, Gretchen) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Kirstjen Nielsen. (dal, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to L. Francis Cissna, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Laura B Zuchowski, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (dal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.