Ward v. Sheriff of Cook County et al
| Arlene Ward |
| Sheriff of Cook County and Certain Unnamed Cook County Sheriff Officers |
| 1:2019cv01384 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the Courtroom Deputy on 4/4/19. Mailed notice(ca, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER : On March 6, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as untimely #6 . Plaintiff has responded to the show-cause order #10 #11 , but her response fails to establish that her claims are timely. As such, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs motion for attorney representation #9 is denied as moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 4/4/19. [For further details see order].Mailed notice(ca, )
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Arlene Ward to March 6, 2019 Court order (mc, ) |
| Filing 10 CORRESPONDENCE to March 6, 2019 court order (Exhibits) by Arlene Ward. (mc, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Arlene Ward for attorney representation (mc, ) |
| Filing 8 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Arlene Ward (mc, ) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by Arlene Ward; Jury Demand. (Exhibit) (tt, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 demonstrates that she cannot prepay the filing fee, and the application is granted. Summons, however, shall not issue at this time. Plaintiff's complaint describes events occurring, at the latest, in January 2016. To proceed with this case, Plaintiff must show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed as untimely. Plaintiff must respond to this order by April 3, 2019. Her failure to respond will result in the summary dismissal of this case. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 3/6/2019. Mailed notice (tt, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Arlene Ward. (smm, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Arlene Ward for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Arlene Ward; (Attachment). (smm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
