Sliwa v. Walmart Inc.
| Cathy Sliwa |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01392 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart Inc. by Kimberly Musick Haskell (Haskell, Kimberly) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cathy Sliwa by David James Starshak (Starshak, David) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Cathy Sliwa by David James Starshak (Starshak, David) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Joint status report due by 5/3/2019. Status hearing set for 5/8/2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/15/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal Letter to counsel of record. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart Inc. by Ariel Terese Flood (Flood, Ariel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Walmart Inc. by James P. Balog (Balog, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Balog, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Cook County, Law Division, case number (2018-L-013857) filed by Walmart Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15525903. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Balog, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sliwa v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ariel Terese Flood |
| Represented By: | James P. Balog |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Musick Haskell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cathy Sliwa | |
| Represented By: | David James Starshak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
