Pinek IP LLC v. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.
| Pinek IP LLC |
| Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01487 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Ruben Castillo |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. by Benjamin J. Bradford (Bradford, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo:Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint #8 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint by 5/9/2019. The motion hearing set for 4/9/2019 is stricken. (rao, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Scott Wayne Breedlove for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Ruben Castillo on 4/9/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Breedlove, Scott) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Unopposed (Breedlove, Scott) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Scott W. Breedlove's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant, Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. #6 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Ruben Castillo on 3/29/2019. Mailed notice (yap, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15645352. (Breedlove, Scott) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ruben Castillo: The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 5/8/2019. The Court will hold a status hearing in open court on 5/14/2019 at 9:45 a.m. (rao, ) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Request letter to to plaintiff's counsel Kenneth Andrew Matuszewski. (yap, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. (kb, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pinek IP LLC by Kenneth Andrew Matuszewski (Matuszewski, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Matuszewski, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pinek IP LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15542099. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Matuszewski, Kenneth) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ruben Castillo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pinek IP LLC v. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pinek IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Andrew Matuszewski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin J. Bradford |
| Represented By: | Scott Wayne Breedlove |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
