In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings
In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings
Case Number: 1:2019cv01717
Filed: March 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Andrea R Wood
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 347 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons in the accompanying Opinion, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 173 the complaints of Plaintiffs represented by Kenneth N. Flaxman P.C. is denied. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 10/14/2022. Mailed notice (axc).
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 172 ORDER signed by the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan on 12/17/2020. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Order, Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order to Prohibit Defendants from Asking Plaintiffs about Uncharged Alleged Criminal Activity 124 is denied. Mailed notice(sxw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?