Colquitt v. JPMorgan Chase & Co
| Janet M Colquitt |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co |
| 1:2019cv01871 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 AMENDED complaint by Janet M Colquitt against JPMorgan Chase & Co (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status and motion hearing held on 7/10/19. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file first amended complaint instanter #25 is granted. Defendant's answer is due by 8/7/19. Initial status hearing set for 9/5/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties revised initial status report is due by 8/2/19. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Motion by Kendra Danielle Spearman for presentment of motion to amend/correct #25 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 7/10/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 25 MOTION by Plaintiff Janet M Colquitt to amend/correct (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 24 STATUS Report (Initial) by JPMorgan Chase & Co (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The status hearing set for 6/25/19 is reset to 7/10/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file an amended joint initial status report prior to the next status hearing.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 22 STATUS Report Defendant's Initial Status Report by JPMorgan Chase & Co (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Janet M Colquitt by Kendra Danielle Spearman (Spearman, Kendra) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Joint motion for extension of time to file their joint status report and reset the status hearing #16 is granted. The status hearing set for 5/30/19 is reset to 6/25/19 at 9:00 a.m. The status report shall be due four days prior to the status hearing. The MIDP deadline is extended until 7/25/19. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by JPMorgan Chase & Co re answer to complaint #18 - CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 18 - DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COMPLAINT - ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by JPMorgan Chase & Co(Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Taylor Nicole Rollinson for presentment of extension of time #16 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 5/30/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co for extension of time (JOINT) (Rollinson, Taylor) |
Filing 15
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #13 and her motion for attorney representation #14 . Plaintiff's IFP application is denied, as she has already paid the filing fee. Her motion for attorney representation is also denied. "There is no right to court-recruited counsel in civil litigation," but the Court has discretion to recruit an attorney to assist a pro se litigant. Olson v. Morgan, 750 F.3d 708, 711 (7th Cir. 2014). In considering such a request, the Court must ask: "(1) has the indigent plaintiff made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel or been effectively precluded from doing so; and if so, (2) given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it [herself]?" Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc). Here, Plaintiff indicates that she has contacted an attorney for assistance, to no avail. However, she provides no other information about why she needs the assistance of pro bono counsel. Rather, her motion indicates that she is a high school graduate. Furthermore, her complaint is clear and easy to follow, and alleges a fairly straightforward set of facts, which Plaintiff personally experienced. At this early stage of litigation, the Court sees no need to recruit counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion #14 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 4/29/2019. Mailed notice. (ew, )
|
| Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Janet M Colquitt for attorney representation. (ew, ) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Janet M Colquitt for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ew, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion for extension of time until May 24, 2019 to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted. The initial status hearing set for 5/23/19 is reset to 5/30/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the status hearing. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co by Thomas Elliott Deer (Deer, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Taylor Nicole Rollinson for presentment of extension of time #9 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 4/25/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co by Taylor Nicole Rollinson (Rollinson, Taylor) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Initial status hearing set for 5/23/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ew, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. (ew, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Janet M Colquitt. (ew, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ew, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Janet M Colquitt; Jury Demand (Exhibit). (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Colquitt v. JPMorgan Chase & Co | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janet M Colquitt | |
| Represented By: | Kendra Danielle Spearman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Elliott Deer |
| Represented By: | Taylor Nicole Rollinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
