Hoeltzer v. Saul
Robert Hoeltzer |
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul |
1:2019cv01920 |
March 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Elaine E Bucklo |
Sheila M Finnegan |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown.Mailed notice (sxw, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/24/19.(aee, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. This case will be sent to the executive committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court are stricken. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
Filing 10 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Brown, James) |
Filing 9 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit)(Przywara, Kathleen) |
Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Robert Hoeltzer. ( Linked document has the incorrect case number.). (aee, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 is granted. The parties should promptly consult with each other on the following topics: 1) Do they agree to consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge; and 2) Do they agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner. The case is set for status on 6/14/2019 at 9:30 a.m. If the parties have agreed to consent or to remand, they need not appear on that date. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Kathleen M. Przywara as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Przywara, Kathleen) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Robert Hoeltzer for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Brown, James) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff is directed to pay the required filing fee or file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by 4/30/19. Absent timely compliance, this case will be dismissed. Mailed notice (reg) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Hoeltzer by James P. Brown (Brown, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Robert Hoeltzer; (Brown, James)( Linked document has the incorrect case number.). Modified on 3/21/2019 (aee, ). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.