Jones v. United States of America
Toby Jones |
United States of America |
1:2019cv01947 |
March 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Matthew F Kennelly |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The government's motion for extension of time #10 is granted, and the hearing date of 6/18/2019 is vacated. The due date for the government's response to defendant's section 2255 motion is extended to 8/5/2019. The due date for Mr. Jones's reply to the government's response is extended to 8/26/2019. Mailed notice. (pjg, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Madeleine Sullivan Murphy for presentment of extension of time #10 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/18/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Murphy, Madeleine) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant United States of America for extension of time (Murphy, Madeleine) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE by Defendant United States of America (Murphy, Madeleine) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Defendant Toby Jones has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Court has reviewed the motion and directs the government to file a response by July 3, 2019. The Court directs Mr. Jones to file a reply to the government's response by July 24, 2019. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/22/2019. Mailed notice (tt, ) |
Filing 7 LETTER from Toby Jones dated 5/13/19. (Envelope postmarked 5/13/19) (tt, ) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM of laws in support of the petitioner's 2255 motion by Toby Jones. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 5/13/19) (Civil case number not on document) (tt, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Toby Jones to ("Amend") the attached (Memorandum Of Law In Support of Petitioner"s 28 U.S.C. 2255, pages 1. thru 100. (Envelope postmarked 4/3/19; institution mail room not postmarked) (tt, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Toby Jones to ("Amend") the attached (Evidence Exhibits, In Support of Petitioner"s 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion Grounds 1. Thru 5. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 4/3/19; institution mail room not postmarked) (tt, ) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Madeleine Sullivan Murphy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States of America (Murphy, Madeleine) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (kp, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) and no copies filed by Toby Jones (Exhibits). (14-cr-155-1) (Attachments: #1 (Postmark illegible) (kp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Toby Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Sean Joseph Byrnes Franzblau |
Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
Represented By: | Madeleine Sullivan Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.