Jones v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Toby Jones
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2019cv01947
Filed: March 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2019 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The government's motion for extension of time #10 is granted, and the hearing date of 6/18/2019 is vacated. The due date for the government's response to defendant's section 2255 motion is extended to 8/5/2019. The due date for Mr. Jones's reply to the government's response is extended to 8/26/2019. Mailed notice. (pjg, )
June 11, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Madeleine Sullivan Murphy for presentment of extension of time #10 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/18/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Murphy, Madeleine)
June 11, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant United States of America for extension of time (Murphy, Madeleine)
June 4, 2019 Filing 9 RESPONSE by Defendant United States of America (Murphy, Madeleine)
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Defendant Toby Jones has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Court has reviewed the motion and directs the government to file a response by July 3, 2019. The Court directs Mr. Jones to file a reply to the government's response by July 24, 2019. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/22/2019. Mailed notice (tt, )
May 17, 2019 Filing 7 LETTER from Toby Jones dated 5/13/19. (Envelope postmarked 5/13/19) (tt, )
May 17, 2019 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM of laws in support of the petitioner's 2255 motion by Toby Jones. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 5/13/19) (Civil case number not on document) (tt, )
April 9, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Toby Jones to ("Amend") the attached (Memorandum Of Law In Support of Petitioner"s 28 U.S.C. 2255, pages 1. thru 100. (Envelope postmarked 4/3/19; institution mail room not postmarked) (tt, )
April 9, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Toby Jones to ("Amend") the attached (Evidence Exhibits, In Support of Petitioner"s 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion Grounds 1. Thru 5. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmarked 4/3/19; institution mail room not postmarked) (tt, )
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Madeleine Sullivan Murphy as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States of America (Murphy, Madeleine)
March 21, 2019 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (kp, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) and no copies filed by Toby Jones (Exhibits). (14-cr-155-1) (Attachments: #1 (Postmark illegible) (kp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toby Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Sean Joseph Byrnes Franzblau
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Madeleine Sullivan Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?