Williams v. Saul
| Lynida R Williams |
| Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2019cv02021 |
| March 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Dkt. 4] is denied without prejudice to re-filing. The Court cannot conclusively determine from Plaintiff's affidavit #4 how her annual income compares to the federal poverty line. The Court requires further specification and clarification in response to Questions 4(g), 8, and 10. In Question 4(g), Plaintiff should clarify who the support is for, and in Question 10, she should answer the full question: "state your relationship to each person and state whether you are entirely responsible for the person's support or the specific monthly amount you contribute to his or her support." Plaintiff also did not answer Question 8 in full. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit, #22 Exhibit, #23 Exhibit, #24 Exhibit, #25 Exhibit, #26 Exhibit)(Arce, Jimmy) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, within 60 days after the filing of the administrative record, Plaintiff shall file a brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review. Within 45 days thereafter, the Commissioner shall file a response and brief in support of affirming the decision subject to review. The plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days thereafter. The parties are directed to review and comply with Judge Rowland's standing orders for Social Security Cases and Agreed Orders, which are available on Judge Rowland's webpage located on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1 for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Charles P. Kocoras no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 5/21/19. (cc, )
|
| Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Brown, James) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Jimmy Lorenzo Arce as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Arce, Jimmy) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Lynida R Williams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Brown, James) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lynida R Williams by James P. Brown (Brown, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Lynida R Williams; (Brown, James) (Modified by Clerk's Office on 3/26/2019) (cc, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
