Jain et al v. The Gap Inc. et al
| Surinder Kumar Jain and Shashi Jain |
| Banana Republic LLC and The Gap Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02181 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Status hearing held and continued to 8/6/2019 at 9:30a.m. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Status hearing set for 6/20/2019 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 5 Defendants' Answers to Plaintiffs' Complaint at Law ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Banana Republic LLC, The Gap Inc.(Malaty, Danielle) |
| Filing 4 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (yap, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Banana Republic LLC, The Gap Inc. by Danielle N Malaty (Malaty, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Malaty, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019L002107) filed by Banana Republic LLC, The Gap Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15651738. (Malaty, Danielle) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
