Harris v. The City of Chicago
| Anthony Harris |
| CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO and The City of Chicago |
| 1:2019cv02229 |
| April 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 7/9/2019. Any renewed motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before 7/19/2019; response shall be filed on or before 8/9/2019; reply shall be filed on or before 8/23/2019; motion hearing set for 9/12/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED complaint by Anthony Harris against All Plaintiffs (Saulter, Keenan) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 6/11/2019. Oral motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted and shall be filed on or before 7/2/2019. Defendant's motion to dismiss #9 is denied without prejudice. Status hearing set for 7/9/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to dismiss #9 , noticed for presentment on 6/6/19. Plaintiff is advised to review the Courts standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Courts homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether he will amend his complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss #9 is entered and continued to the initial status conference on 6/11/19, and Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss at that time. The 6/6/19 Notice of Motion date is stricken, and the parties need not appear. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Mark J. Bereyso for presentment of motion to dismiss #9 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 6/6/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Bereyso, Mark) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant The City of Chicago to dismiss COMPLAINT (Bereyso, Mark) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Joann Giyun Lim (Lim, Joann) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Mark J. Bereyso (Bereyso, Mark) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the representations in Plaintiff's initial status report #4 , the initial status conference previously set for 5/16/19 is stricken and reset for 6/11/19 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Harris as to The City of Chicago on 5/9/2019, answer due 5/30/2019. (Saulter, Keenan) |
| Filing 4 STATUS Report Initial Individual Status Report by Anthony Harris (Saulter, Keenan) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The City of Chicago (mc, ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP%20Standing%20Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 5/16/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 5/6/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mma, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anthony Harris; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15660695.(Saulter, Keenan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
