Greenleaf v. City Of Chicago et al
Raynetta Greenleaf |
Chicago Board of Election, David Moore and City Of Chicago |
1:2019cv02294 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sharon Johnson Coleman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 6/11/2019. Plaintiff's motion for default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 #11 is granted. Default is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant David Moore. Status hearing set for 7/16/2019 at 9:15 AM to stand. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Status hearing held on 6/3/2019. Status hearing is set for 7/16/2019 at 9:15 AM. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Raynetta Greenleaf for presentment of motion for default judgment #11 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 6/11/2019 at 08:45 AM. (las, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Raynetta Greenleaf for default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 55 (las, ) |
ALIAS Summons Issued as to Defendants Chicago Board of Election, City Of Chicago. (jn, ) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Raynetta Greenleaf as to City Of Chicago. (mc, ) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Raynetta Greenleaf as to Chicago Board of Election. (mc, ) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raynetta Greenleaf as to David Moore on 4/15/2019, answer due 5/6/2019. (mc, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman and is set for a status hearing on 6/3/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are reminded to review the timelines set out in this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Chicago Board of Election, City Of Chicago, and David Moore. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Raynetta Greenleaf. (ph, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Raynetta Greenleaf; Jury Demand; Notice. (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.