Puteri v. The Boeing Company
Tassya Dianti Puteri |
The Boeing Company |
1:2019cv02296 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert M Dow |
P.I.: Airplane Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Defendant the Boeing Company's motion to voluntary withdraw notice of removal #11 is granted. Status hearing set for 5/21/2019 is stricken. Case closed. Notice of motion date of 4/15/2019 is stricken and no appearance are necessary on that date. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Bates McIntyre Larson for presentment of motion to withdraw #11 before Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. on 4/15/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Larson, Bates) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant The Boeing Company to withdraw notice of removal, #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Larson, Bates) |
Filing 10 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to all counsel of record. (smm, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 5/21/2019 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Gretchen Marie Paine (Paine, Gretchen) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Mack Harrison Shultz, Jr (Shultz, Mack) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Daniel Thomas Burley (Burley, Daniel) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Bates McIntyre Larson (Larson, Bates) |
Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Boeing Company (Larson, Bates) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Larson, Bates) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2019 L 001980) filed by The Boeing Company Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15675142. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Larson, Bates) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.