Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Koch Foods Inc.
| Arch Specialty Insurance Company |
| Koch Foods Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02323 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to FRCP 7.1 STATEMENT by Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Foran, Michael) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. Koch Foods Inc. waiver sent on 5/3/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. (Foran, Michael) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arch Specialty Insurance Company by Matthew Peter Fortin (Fortin, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 7/18/2019 at 09:30 AM. Rule 26(f) planning report re MIDP due 7/15/2019. The report must comply with the requirements of the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program of the district court. The report form can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (reg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arch Specialty Insurance Company by Michael Leonard Foran (Foran, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Foran, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15680055. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Foran, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Koch Foods Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Koch Foods Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arch Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael Leonard Foran |
| Represented By: | Matthew Peter Fortin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
