Image Media Advertising, Inc. v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
| Image Media Advertising, Inc. |
| Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02387 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiff Image Media Advertising, Inc.. (Oakley, James) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.. (Morency, Paula) |
| Filing 21 REPLY by Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. to response in opposition to motion, #20 Reply Brief in Support of Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Angelino, Sarah) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE by Image Media Advertising, Inc.in Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Fourth Billboard, #2 Exhibit B - Survey 3 Billboards, #3 Exhibit C - Survey 4 Billboards, #4 Exhibit D - Survey 5 Billboards, #5 Exhibit E - Permit Fourth Billboard, #6 Exhibit F - IDOT Regulation, #7 Exhibit G - GIS Map Website Disclaimer)(Oakley, James) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial Status hearing held on 5/14/2019. Plaintiff's oral motion for extension of time to respond to Motion to Dismiss #13 is granted. Response due by 5/23/2019. Reply due by 6/4/2019. Status hearing set for 7/22/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 18 STATUS Report - Joint by Image Media Advertising, Inc. (Oakley, James) |
| Filing 17 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (Angelino, Sarah) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule as to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #13 . Response due by 5/16/2019. Reply due by 5/23/2019. Status Hearing set for 7/22/2019 at 9:00 AM. Initial Status hearing set for 5/14/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Kevin James Whelan for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #13 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/14/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Whelan, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Whelan, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (Whelan, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's MotionMotion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted. Answer shall be due by 4/30/2019. Initial Status hearing set for 5/14/2019 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 4/17/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Image Media Advertising, Inc. by James Leo Oakley (Oakley, James) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Kevin James Whelan for presentment of extension of time #9 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/17/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Whelan, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Unopposed Motion) (Whelan, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Image Media Advertising, Inc. by Holly Hannah Campbell (Campbell, Holly) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. by Kevin James Whelan (Whelan, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. by Sarah Katherine Angelino (Angelino, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. by Paula J. Morency (Morency, Paula) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (yap, ) |
| Filing 3 EMAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (yap, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Angelino, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2019L002324) filed by Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15693622. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Rule 222(b) Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, Summons, Affidavit of Service, and Notice of Calendar Call, #4 Exhibit Cook County Electronic Docket Report)(Angelino, Sarah) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
