First Mercury Insurance Company v. Triple Location LLC
Plaintiff: First Mercury Insurance Company
Defendant: Triple Location LLC d/b/a Club O and Triple Location LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv02395
Filed: April 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Gary Feinerman
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2019 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff First Mercury Insurance Company by Bevin A Carroll (Carroll, Bevin)
June 17, 2019 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by First Mercury Insurance Company as to Triple Location LLC on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. (Hickey, James)
June 12, 2019 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: The docket again does not reflect that summons has been issued. The status hearing set for 6/19/2019 #8 is stricken and re-set for 7/22/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff again is reminded of the requirements of Civil Rule 4(m).Mailed notice. (jlj, )
June 4, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Triple Location LLC. (ew, )
June 3, 2019 Filing 9 First AMENDED complaint by First Mercury Insurance Company against Triple Location LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Hickey, James)
May 16, 2019 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: The docket does not reflect that summons has been issued, let alone served. Status hearing set for 5/22/2019 at 9:00 a.m. #7 is stricken and re-set for 6/19/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff is reminded of the requirements of Civil Rule 4(m). Mailed notice. (jjr, )
April 25, 2019 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:The jurisdictional addendum #6 having established, at least for pleading purposes, that the parties are completely diverse, the order to show cause #5 is discharged. The status hearing set for 4/30/2019 #5 is stricken and re-set for 5/22/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, )
April 24, 2019 Filing 6 Jurisdictional Addendum by First Mercury Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hickey, James)
April 11, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by 4/25/2019 why this case should not be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The complaint premises jurisdiction under the diversity statute, but it does not properly allege Defendant's citizenship. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a pleading styled "Jurisdictional Addendum" that properly alleges Defendants' citizenship. Failure to show cause will result in the dismissal of this lawsuit for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The status hearing set for 5/21/2019 #4 is stricken and re-set for 4/30/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
April 10, 2019 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 5/21/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, )
April 10, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, )
April 9, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff First Mercury Insurance Company by James Joseph Hickey (Hickey, James)
April 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Delcaratory Judgment filed by First Mercury Insurance Company; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15694378. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hickey, James)
April 9, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Gary Feinerman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: First Mercury Insurance Company v. Triple Location LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Mercury Insurance Company
Represented By: James Joseph Hickey
Represented By: Bevin A Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Triple Location LLC d/b/a Club O
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Triple Location LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?