MacNeil Automotive Products Limited v. Jinrong (SH) Automotive Accessory Development Co., Ltd. et al
| MacNeil Automotive Products Limited d/b/a WeatherTech and MacNeil Automotive Products Limited |
| Jinrong (SH) Automotive Accessory Development Co., Ltd. and Rui Dai |
| 1:2019cv02460 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The motion noticed for presentment in this case at 9:30 AM on 7/11/2019 will be addressed at the 9:00 AM status hearing rather than at the 9:30 AM motion call. (mk) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Robert S. Grabemann for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief #11 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/11/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff MacNeil Automotive Products LimitedAlternative Service Pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-4)(Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Rule 16(b) status hearing held on 6/11/2019 with only plaintiff's attorney. Defendants have not yet been served with summons. Status hearing is continued to 7/11/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (pjg, ) |
| Filing 9 STATUS Report PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL STATUS REPORT/LPR EXHIBIT A by MacNeil Automotive Products Limited (Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Initial status hearing is set to 9:00 a.m. on 6/11/2019 before Judge Kennelly, in Chambers, Room 2188. Parties are to review and comply with Judge Kennelly's standing initial order, which may be found on his web page, located at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/JUDGES/KENNELLY/INIT-ORD.htm. Counsel for plaintiff(s) are ordered to cause a copy of this order to be delivered forthwith to each defendant who has not yet appeared by counsel in the same manner that summons has been or is being served on each defendant. A completed copy of Appendix A to the Local Patent Rules, including a listing of actual dates corresponding to the due dates contained in the Local Patent Rules, is to be filed by 6/7/2019. (mk) |
| Filing 7 MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. (bg, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by MacNeil Automotive Products Limited d/b/a WeatherTech (Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Patents and Trademarks in Suit by MacNeil Automotive Products Limited d/b/a WeatherTech (Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MacNeil Automotive Products Limited d/b/a WeatherTech by Timothy M Schaum (Schaum, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MacNeil Automotive Products Limited d/b/a WeatherTech by Robert S. Grabemann (Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Grabemann, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by MacNeil Automotive Products Limited d/b/a WeatherTech; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15705590. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 2-3)(Grabemann, Robert) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
